|
|
The Doorpost · Issue 41 · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Guard the Flock
“Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.” (Acts 20:28)
Father, today’s three stories are all about the condition of the Church from the inside, and they ask difficult questions. Bethel Church is acknowledging that it knew about misconduct involving several high-profile ministry figures and did not act quickly enough or clearly enough to protect the people in its care. Beth Moore is publicly accusing the Southern Baptist Convention of prioritizing the pulpit over protecting women from abusive leaders, one week before the SBC’s annual meeting. And in Texas, a Democrat running for U.S. Senate is claiming the name of Christianity while saying that God is nonbinary, that the Bible permits abortion, and that there are six biological sexes. Lord, anchor us in Your Word today. All three of these stories are answered by it. In Jesus’ name, Amen.
Today’s issue covers Bethel’s leadership review and the biblical case for elder-governed churches with strong accountability structures, the Beth Moore and SBC dispute and what Scripture says about handling conflict within the Church, and James Talarico’s campaign to “reclaim Christianity for the left” and why his version of it is not Christianity. Go well.
|
|
Sponsored By:
The Tuttle Twins
We’ve trusted the Tuttle Twins books in our own home for years — and we’re excited to share them with our readers.
These books teach timeless values like freedom, responsibility, entrepreneurship, and critical thinking in a way kids actually enjoy. If you want resources that help raise informed, confident, liberty-minded children, we wholeheartedly recommend the Tuttle Twins series.
Check Them Out →
|
|
|
|
|
Top Stories
Three Headlines to Watch
1) Bethel Church’s Leadership Review Is a Case Study in Why Elder Accountability Matters
Bethel Church in Redding, California has deplatformed Shawn Bolz, Mike Bickle, and Todd Bentley following a leadership review. In January 2026, senior leaders Bill Johnson, Kris Vallotton, and Dann Farrelly released a formal letter acknowledging that they had known since 2019 about allegations against Bolz involving sexual misconduct and the faking of prophetic words of knowledge, mining social media for personal details rather than receiving divine revelation. They acknowledged they had not communicated clearly or promptly to the wider church when they ended their association with him. Vallotton wrote: “The truth is, we have hurt and scared people because we did not tell the truth early enough, long enough or loud enough.” The letter came only after apologist Mike Winger released a detailed exposé prompting widespread public attention. Bolz, Bickle, and Bentley had all been given significant platforms through Bethel over a period of years.
This is not an isolated incident at Bethel. The church has a documented pattern of platforming high-profile figures whose conduct later proved disqualifying, and of moving slowly when problems were brought to leadership’s attention. When a church is built around a high-profile senior leader rather than a plurality of elders with genuine authority, the accountability structures that should catch problems early are weakened. When outside figures gain large platforms through a church’s influence without corresponding oversight, the church’s own credibility becomes tied to their conduct in ways that make it harder to act quickly when problems emerge. The result, documented here across multiple incidents, is that people were hurt by individuals the church had endorsed, and the church delayed communicating what it knew. Read the full story at Premier Christian News →
| |
Doorpost Reflection
The Pastoral Epistles describe church governance with precision for exactly this reason. 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 establish that a bishop or elder must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, not a lover of money, and one who manages his own household well. These are not aspirational qualities. They are the minimum bar for holding the office. A church with a functioning elder board and strong bylaws does not have a single senior leader whose relationships and endorsements go unchecked. Decisions about who gets a platform, what happens when allegations arise, and how the congregation is informed are made by a group of accountable leaders rather than by a few people whose own credibility is tangled up with the person being investigated.
This structure also protects the leaders themselves. When a senior pastor faces an accusation, a functioning elder board can investigate without the outcome depending entirely on that pastor’s own account. When a church must distance itself from a figure it has promoted, elders with genuine authority can act without waiting for public pressure to force the issue. The bylaws of a church are not a bureaucratic inconvenience. They are the structural expression of the biblical principle that no leader is above accountability, and that the flock God purchased with His own blood deserves the protection that shared oversight provides. Every church without that structure should build it, for the sake of the congregation and for the sake of the leaders themselves.
|
Scripture: “Let elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching.” — 1 Timothy 5:17
2) Beth Moore and the SBC: A Public Dispute That Calls for Prayer, Not Sides
One week before the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting, Beth Moore posted publicly on social media accusing the SBC of prioritizing protecting the pulpit from women over protecting women from abusive leaders. “When protecting the pulpit from women becomes a far greater priority than protecting women and children from an abusive pulpit, something is wrong,” she wrote. Moore left the SBC in 2021 after forty years. Her departure followed the denomination’s abuse crisis becoming public and what she described as a simultaneous tightening of restrictions on women’s roles. She has continued to comment on SBC affairs since leaving. The timing of her statement, one week before the annual meeting, has drawn both support from those who share her concerns about abuse accountability and criticism from those who question the public nature and the timing of the dispute.
The SBC’s annual meeting will address several significant matters, including a proposed constitutional amendment from Al Mohler that would prohibit churches from affirming women serving in the office or function of a pastor, elder, or overseer. The SBC has documented significant failures in its handling of sexual abuse cases over the years, and the denomination has made some structural reforms in response. Whether those reforms have been sufficient is a genuine and serious question. Moore’s concern about abuse accountability is legitimate. The question of women in church leadership is also a genuine theological question on which Scripture speaks and Southern Baptists hold a clearly stated position. The two issues, abuse accountability and pastoral leadership qualifications, are real and worth engaging seriously, but raising them together in a public dispute the week before the annual meeting is unlikely to produce the kind of careful, biblical resolution either issue deserves. Read the full story at ChurchLeaders →
| |
Doorpost Reflection
Matthew 18:15 gives the first instruction when a fellow believer has done something wrong: go to them privately. The principle behind that instruction is that the goal of confrontation within the Church is restoration and resolution, not public pressure. When a dispute becomes a social media statement the week before an annual meeting, it is worth asking honestly what outcome that approach is designed to produce. That is not a dismissal of Moore’s concerns. Abuse accountability in the SBC is a real and serious issue that deserves serious attention. The denomination has documented failures in this area, and the reforms it has made are still being tested. Those concerns are legitimate and must be heard.
The biblical pattern for addressing grievances within the Church, however, is not to amplify them publicly on a platform before a major denominational meeting. Scripture calls for private confrontation first, then witnesses, then the wider church if resolution cannot be reached. That process exists to protect both the accused and the accuser, to pursue truth without spectacle, and to give the Church the best chance of actually resolving what is broken. We pray for Beth Moore, for the SBC, for the victims of abuse who are still waiting for full accountability, and for the annual meeting. May it be governed by Scripture and not by the temperature of social media.
|
Scripture: “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.” — Matthew 18:15
3) James Talarico Wants to “Reclaim Christianity for the Left.” The Bible Does Not Support His Version of It.
James Talarico, a 36-year-old Texas state representative running as a Democrat for U.S. Senate, has built a national following by claiming to offer a Christian case for progressive politics. The New York Times featured him this week under the headline “Can He Reclaim Christianity for the Left?” Talarico, who holds a master’s degree in theological studies from Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary and hopes to become a pastor, argues that his progressive positions are rooted in his Christian faith. His specific theological claims include: that God is nonbinary, a statement he made on the floor of the Texas legislature in 2021; that the Bible permits abortion, arguing that the angel Gabriel’s interaction with Mary in Luke 1 constitutes a model of consent that endorses pro-abortion rights; that there are six biological sexes; and that poverty is a form of violence. He told Joe Rogan in September 2025 that atheists are often more Christ-like than his Christian colleagues in the legislature.
None of these positions have a defensible basis in Scripture. The claim that God is nonbinary contradicts Genesis 1:27, which describes God creating human beings as male and female in His image, and the consistent scriptural pattern of referring to God in masculine terms. The claim that Gabriel asking Mary for consent in Luke 1 endorses abortion is a fundamental misreading of the text: the passage describes the announcement of a miraculous conception, not a choice about whether to terminate one, and Mary’s response, “Let it be to me according to your word,” is an act of willing submission to God’s plan, not a model for abortion rights. The claim that there are six biological sexes has no basis in biology or in Scripture. Genesis 1 describes God creating human beings male and female, full stop. Talarico is running for Senate in Texas on a platform that has received the enthusiastic endorsement of the New York Times and progressive media. We pray that Texans judge his claims by what the Bible actually says. Read the New York Times story →
| |
Doorpost Reflection
James Talarico is not offering a different interpretation of Christianity. He is using Christian language to advance positions that Scripture directly and explicitly condemns, and he is doing it with enough skill and charm that the New York Times is happy to give him a platform. That is the definition of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Jesus warned about exactly this in Matthew 7:15: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.” The marker Jesus gave for identifying them is not their vocabulary or their seminary degree. It is their fruit. Talarico’s fruit includes claiming God is nonbinary, using Mary’s submission to God’s will as a justification for abortion, insisting there are six biological sexes, and telling a national audience that atheists are more Christ-like than his Christian colleagues. None of that is Christianity. It is the systematic dismantling of biblical truth dressed in theological language.
The secular press enthusiastically promotes Talarico because his version of Christianity has surrendered every position that makes progressive elites uncomfortable. A Christianity that endorses abortion, denies the binary nature of sex as God created it, and calls God nonbinary is not Christianity at all. It is a political platform with a cross painted on it. Texans who call themselves Christians must not be fooled by the vocabulary. Galatians 1:8 leaves no room for ambiguity: if anyone preaches a gospel contrary to what was received, let him be accursed. We pray that Texans reject Talarico’s candidacy and his theology both, and we pray that he himself would one day encounter the actual Jesus of Scripture, whose words cannot be bent to fit a Senate campaign.
|
Scripture: “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:8
|
|
|
|
Daily Scripture
Verse of the Day
|
“Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.”
Acts 20:28
|
Paul spoke these words to the elders of Ephesus in his farewell address. The instruction has two parts, and both matter. Pay careful attention to yourselves: leaders are not immune to the failures they are supposed to prevent in others. The elder board is not a watchdog for everyone else while its own members go unexamined. Pay careful attention to all the flock: the people in your care are not abstractions. They are individuals who trusted the leaders God placed over them, and that trust carries a responsibility that Paul describes as weighty enough to warrant the phrase “the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.” The flock belongs to God. Leaders are stewards of something they did not purchase.
Today’s three stories are all, at their core, about what happens when that attention fails. Bethel’s leadership knew about misconduct and did not move quickly enough to protect the people who trusted its endorsements. The SBC’s documented failures in handling abuse are the result of institutional structures that, in too many cases, protected leaders rather than the people they abused. And Talarico’s campaign is a reminder that the flock is always at risk from teachers who speak Christian language while leading people away from what Scripture actually says. The answer in every case is the same: elders who pay careful attention, to themselves and to the flock, accountable to each other, governed by the Word.
Father, we pray for Your Church today. Not for any one denomination or movement, but for the entire body of Christ across every tradition, every congregation, and every stream. We pray that Your Church would hold to biblical standards of leadership and accountability, that elders would lead with integrity, that the vulnerable would be protected, and that no leader would be placed above the correction of Your Word. Where churches have drifted from Scripture, whether through the pursuit of celebrity, the protection of reputation, or the accommodation of culture, bring them back. Where conflict has become public spectacle rather than biblical resolution, restore the humility and the process Your Word prescribes. And where the name of Christ is being used to advance agendas that contradict what He actually said, give Your people the discernment to recognize it and the courage to say so. Christ is Lord of the Church. His Word is the standard. Everything else must answer to it. In Jesus’ name, Amen.
|
|
|
|
Bible Trivia
Scripture Stumper
|
Question: Today’s Bethel story highlights the importance of elder-led governance. The Pastoral Epistles give detailed qualifications for church leaders. In Titus 1:7, Paul describes the overseer as “God’s steward.” Just before listing the positive qualifications, Paul gives five things an overseer must not be. Which of the following is NOT one of the five things listed in Titus 1:7?
A) Arrogant
B) Quick-tempered
C) A lover of money
D) Domineering over those in his charge
Reveal Answer
|
|
|